Re: Commentary: "The Temporal Syndrome"

From: Fred Sloniker <lazuli_at_u.washington.edu>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 1995 17:36:36 -0800 (PST)

On Thu, 23 Feb 1995, Dan Drazen wrote:

> P.S.: have any of the artists who have submitted erotic fanart
> considered the fact that the characters in question are all UNDERAGE?

(grins) Well, I haven't submitted any, but I've considered it... and as
Robotnik doesn't need any more excuses to have the entire group
robotisized, and he is what currently passes for law on Mobius, it's not
really a factor (except for Tails, who hasn't even hit puberty yet).
Still, I don't think Sonic and Sally are, ahem, doing it off-camera;
Sonic's metabolism is too hyper to accept a partner nowhere near his
speed, while Sally's probably saving herself for when she can be a
princess again and has to find a prince. As for the rest of the Freedom
Fighters, lack of suitable partners, either biologically (Dulcey) or
emotionally (let's face it, *no* one wants to sleep with Antoine) pretty
much rules out any further contributions to the Freedom Fighter forces.

*BIG* smileys pasted all over this message. (:3

> Sonic & Sally and 15-16 (depending on whether you follow the Archie
> Comic or "Drood Henge" chronology) and Tails is a tender 10 years old.

Has Tails' age been stated as 10 in the comic? If not, we can assume
(until they say otherwise) that the comic is simply set a year earlier
than the show... wasn't Nicole just recently introduced in the comic?
That would support this hypothesis.

                                ---Fred M. Sloniker, stressed undergrad
                                   L. Lazuli R'kamos, FurryMUCKer
                                   lazuli_at_u.washington.edu

Jr ner rkcrevrapvat grpuavpny qvssvphygvrf. Cyrnfr fgnaq ol.

Received on Thu Feb 23 1995 - 20:34:08 PST