Re: Why why WHY???

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: David Gonterman <dgonterman_at_aol.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 96 15:58:05 0000

*That* was a flame, Joseph?

No, that was not. *That* was an intelligent answer to the question
given.

*The Question* itself was a flame. Aimed to all the wusses who think
that only pics of naked whatever comprise the Net...

David Gonterman

Received on Mon Feb 05 1996 - 17:41:38 PST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: William Graham: "Re: Mobius Trek: Voygur"
Previous message: Dan Drazen: "Re: Mobius: The Next Generation"
Maybe in reply to: Kris Kelley: "Why why *WHY*???"
Next in thread: Joseph Delacroix: "Re: Why why *WHY*???"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Thu Mar 19 2015 - 12:17:03 PDT

Re: Why why *WHY*???

Re: Why why WHY???