Re: Um...this 'forward' gets some extra comments...

From: B-ko Daitokuji <gvvy03_at_snowcrest.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 1996 20:58:11 -0800

>(Here's the forwarded part ">")
Wow! Here's your forwarded stuff. You see, the more ">"'s there are, the
more times It's been quoted, when sometimes not necesary (I myself used to
do this, of course, to an extreme.)

>>Due to a school Internet agreement, I cannot use My real name, so therefore,
>>I am now changing my name to Grand Admiral Thrawn. Sorry, but one of the
>>people in charge of making sure that nothing gets screwed up or that pervs
>>don't send us kiddie-porn-type-crud. Well, I am still trying to get Ted
>>Turner's <UUGGHH> E-Mail address.

Why uugghh? Getting his E-Mail address would be the best thing ever!

>> Also, I am doing something (nothing that
>>will get the Feds on my case) involving ToonNet_at_AOL.COM (Hah!!!! Have fun
>>trying to figure out what that will be!)

Don't worry, I'll make him spill it, then I'll tell (If I'm feeling
especially cruel, of course!).

>
>...and here's my pre-emptive editorial.
>

Huh?

>Dude, Toonnet_at_aol.com represents the Cartoon Network. I've talked with the
>Cartoon Network - they're on our side -

Uh, huh, right! Well, mabye.....

> and would like nothing better than
>more katseps to run beyond the completed 24.

WAHT'S IT'S NAME????????????????

> Unfortunately, Turner is set up
>so that the slowest form of communication occurs horizontally, so Cartoon
Network's
>lines of communication to the rest of the Turner Empire are actually
*worse* than
>ours to the Turner Empire.

Well, who'se in charge of the corperation. What else would wou expect
(insert evil grin!).

> Scary, isn't it?

No, very hopefull! Mabye we can get closer than TCN (and yes, I DIDN'T knock
it [again])

> For instance, Cartoon Network started
>receiving a ton of katmail at that there "toonnet" address, and someone there
>started making enquiries of the Turner chain-of-command as to why such an
>obviously popular show was canned in favour of relative drivel. Turner
took a few
>days, then one of the suits in the heirarchy came up with "ratings". In
reality, the
>answer should've been "Pirates of Dark Water"; the same type of mismanagement
>was responsible for the clueless behaviour witnessed in either sorry
spectacle.
>
So you're saying, we're beginning to make a dent here? That's good. We
should all persist on this. Once it dies, who knows what might happen (more
WPT's YUK!)

>The labyrinth of the Turner organization is designed so that it's impossible to
>simply pick up the phone, dial someone in the Atlanta Pentagon, and actually
>get connected to someone willing to take responsibility for something. Many
>have tried both within and without.
>
Another reason America is so screwed up today. It's not teens, it's people
like Ted Making bad choices blaming it on the younger generation. Any comments?

> All of that can still be considered
>"positive", but adding juvenile internet parlor tricks to up the ante and
spam addresses
>setup for fan feedback is not acceptable behaviour, is utterly
counterproductive, and
>won't be cheered on the sidelines by any of the katfans I know.

You don't know me very well. Whatever works to a posative goal toward SWAT
Kats, you'll se me doing!

>Turner screwed up big with public-relations on this whole Kat-thing, but we
don't
>need to press the big "down" button to descend to the same level, do we?

It dosn't matter to me. If I have to a level lower to reach what I want,
I'll do it. Remember, some people do get vicious when it comes to SWAT Kats
(or Anti-SWAT Kats mainly from my freinds [soon to be seen otherwise]).

_______________________________________
Ryan "B-ko "Snoopy" Daitokuji" Kelley
SWAT Kats Extremist
Good thing you can't see me in person!!
_______________________________________



Received on Tue Feb 20 1996 - 00:35:36 PST