Re: Comments on Sonic Comic #29 (spoilers) (fwd)

From: Erich Schulman (KTN4CA) Team OS/2 <"Erich>
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 1995 22:02:55 -0400 (EDT)

This is a forwarded message. If you would like to reply to its author
directly, please be sure your reply is addressed to cjb_at_brushtail.hna.com.au.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: 10 Oct 1995 07:12:36 +1000
From: Chris Baird <cjb_at_brushtail.hna.com.au>
To: sonic_at_sard.mv.net
Newgroups: brush.lists.sonic
Subject: Re: Comments on Sonic Comic #29 (spoilers)

<Sugahhog_at_aol.com>,
 [...] but I really don't think that Fiona has had any time (considering
> her behavior) to evolve any, like the other mechanical being's I've
> listed. After all, there's no guarantee that she would anyway, unless
> Robotnik had incorporated some of the "self awareness and adaptability
> programs from his EVE schematics into Fiona and the other robots he
> created...

Don't forgot Robotnik also has the technology from the replicants appearing
in Sally's miniseries. Maybe the original Fiona is around somewheres...

>> Finally, with the part with the tear in Fiona's eye [...]

Weird Hypothesis[tm] time-- the hydrolic fluid used in the robots is
acutely hygroscopic, and immersion in water causes this fluid it to
expand (blame cheap manufacture for the robots not being osmosis-
proof :), the articulated joints then cease, and sometimes the
internal tubing ruptures and the machine begins to leak...
My flatmate gives a lot of attention to the braking system
in his Mini-Minor, I get to see this all the time. :)

--
Chris,,


Received on Mon Oct 09 1995 - 22:21:28 PDT